Instructional Approaches and Student Creativity as Separate Determinants of Mathematics Learning Outcomes: Findings from a Factorial Quasi-Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64268/jtse.v1i2.66Keywords:
Contextual cooperative learning, Instructional approaches, Mathematics learning outcomes, Quasi-experimental study, Student CreativityAbstract
Background: Differences in students’ creative capacities are often overlooked in mathematics instruction, even though they may influence how learners respond to various teaching approaches. As a result, the specific contribution of instructional approaches and creativity to mathematics learning outcomes has not been sufficiently clarified.
Aims: This study seeks to investigate the influence of instructional approaches and student creativity levels on mathematics learning outcomes and to explore whether these factors interact in shaping students’ achievement.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted using a 2×3 factorial design. Seventh-grade students were selected through cluster random sampling. Mathematics achievement was measured using a standardized test, while student creativity was assessed through a questionnaire. Data normality and homogeneity were examined before applying a two-way analysis of variance with unequal cell sizes.
Result: The analysis reveals that instructional approaches significantly affect mathematics learning outcomes, with students exposed to contextual cooperative instruction achieving higher scores than those receiving direct instruction. Creativity levels also show a significant influence, as students with higher creativity consistently demonstrate better learning outcomes. However, the interaction between instructional approaches and creativity levels is not statistically significant.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that instructional approaches and student creativity independently contribute to mathematics learning outcomes. Therefore, improving achievement requires both the use of effective teaching approaches and sustained efforts to develop students’ creative capacities, rather than relying on their combined interaction.
References
Abedi, E. A. (2024). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: Implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6
Akinpelu, G. A., Akinpelu, S. A., Folorunsho, M. S., Ameen, K. S., Adebayo, S. R., & Daramola, C. Y. (2025). Impact of mastery learning instructional scheme on post-basic school students’ engagement levels in mathematics in Osogbo, Nigeria. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00535-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00535-1
Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
Bakker, A., Cai, J., & Zenger, L. (2021). Future themes of mathematics education research: An international survey before and during the pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10049-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10049-w
Boon, M., Orozco, M., & Sivakumar, K. (2022). Epistemological and educational issues in teaching practice-oriented scientific research: Roles for philosophers of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 12(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-022-00447-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-022-00447-z
Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2023). Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746
Bullard, A. J., & Bahar, A. K. (2023a). Common barriers in teaching for creativity in K-12 classrooms: A literature review. Journal of Creativity, 33(1), 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100045
Bullard, A. J., & Bahar, A. K. (2023b). Common barriers in teaching for creativity in K-12 classrooms: A literature review. Journal of Creativity, 33(1), 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100045
Christopher, C., & Nesbitt, K. (2023). Consistency and inconsistency in learning experiences across the early grades. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1265501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1265501
Cremin, T., & Chappell, K. (2021). Creative pedagogies: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677757
Eberhard, K. (2023). The effects of visualization on judgment and decision-making: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 73(1), 167–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00235-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00235-8
Henriksen, D., Creely, E., Henderson, M., & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and technology in teaching and learning: A literature review of the uneasy space of implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2091–2108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09912-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09912-z
Huang, F., Teo, T., & Scherer, R. (2022). Investigating the antecedents of university students’ perceived ease of using the Internet for learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1710540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1710540
Joklitschke, J., Rott, B., & Schindler, M. (2022). Notions of Creativity in Mathematics Education Research: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(6), 1161–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10192-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10192-z
Kurbanbekov, B., Ramankulov, S., Nurizinova, M., & Asanbek, B. (2025). Impact of VR technology in physics teaching on students’ knowledge: A study on body acceleration. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(6), 5038–5053. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i6.34942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i6.34942
Langenberg, B., Helm, J. L., & Mayer, A. (2024). Bayesian Analysis of Multi-Factorial Experimental Designs Using SEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 59(4), 716–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2024.2315557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2024.2315557
Leach, N. (2022). Impactful Learning Environments: A Humanistic Approach to Fostering Adolescents’ Postindustrial Social Skills. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 62(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818779948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818779948
Lee, M., Hong, J. K., Son, J., & Jang, Y. (2025). Effects of teachers’ explicit instruction on self-regulated learning in elementary school mathematics classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102423
Leikin, R., & Elgrably, H. (2022). Strategy creativity and outcome creativity when solving open tasks: Focusing on problem posing through investigations. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01319-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01319-1
Liu, J., Keane, T., Sun, D., Yang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2025). Design and evaluation of ChatGPT-MWPS: An AI-enhanced learning system for improving primary students’ mathematical word problem solving. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00419-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00419-9
Liu, L. (2025). Impact of AI gamification on EFL learning outcomes and nonlinear dynamic motivation: Comparing adaptive learning paths, conversational agents, and storytelling. Education and Information Technologies, 30(8), 11299–11338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13296-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13296-5
Lv, L., Zhong, B., & Liu, X. (2023). A literature review on the empirical studies of the integration of mathematics and computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8171–8193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11518-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11518-2
Marrone, R., Taddeo, V., & Hill, G. (2022). Creativity and Artificial Intelligence—A Student Perspective. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030065
Moser, K. M., Wei, T., & Brenner, D. (2021). Remote teaching during COVID-19: Implications from a national survey of language educators. System, 97, 102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102431
Mystakidis, S., Berki, E., & Valtanen, J.-P. (2021). Deep and Meaningful E-Learning with Social Virtual Reality Environments in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052412
Newton, D., Wang, Y. (Linda), & Newton, L. (2022). ‘Allowing them to dream’: Fostering creativity in mathematics undergraduates. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(10), 1334–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2075719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2075719
Nokelainen, P., Kaarakka, T., Hirvonen, J., Puhakka, I., Kangaslampi, R., Ali-Löytty, S., Vuorenpää, V., & Viro, E. (2025). Self-Efficacy, Emotions and Mathematics Achievement: Longitudinal Effects of Flipped Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70148
Ortiz-Rojas, M., Chiluiza, K., Valcke, M., & Bolanos-Mendoza, C. (2025). How gamification boosts learning in STEM higher education: A mixed methods study. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00521-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00521-3
Pénasse, J., & Renneboog, L. (2022). Speculative Trading and Bubbles: Evidence from the Art Market. Management Science, 68(7), 4939–4963. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4088
Rahiem, M. D. H. (2021). Remaining motivated despite the limitations: University students’ learning propensity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Children and Youth Services Review, 120, 105802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105802
Salami, O. O., & Spangenberg, E. D. (2025). Evaluating mathematics teachers’ usage of online tools to enhance learning performance of high school students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(6), 4443–4455. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i6.33960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i6.33960
Simsek, A. (2021). The Macroeconomics of Financial Speculation. Annual Review of Economics, 13(Volume 13, 2021), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-092120-050543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-092120-050543
Wakhata, R., Mutarutinya, V., & Balimuttajjo, S. (2022). Secondary school students’ attitude towards mathematics word problems. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 444. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01449-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01449-1
Wang, Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence in educational leadership: A symbiotic role of human-artificial intelligence decision-making. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2020-0216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2020-0216
Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2021). College Students’ Time Management: A Self-Regulated Learning Perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1319–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z
Xenofontos, C., & Mouroutsou, S. (2023). Resilience in mathematics education research: A systematic review of empirical studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(7), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2115132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2115132
Zampetakis, L. A., & Melas, C. (2021). The health belief model predicts vaccination intentions against COVID-19: A survey experiment approach. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 13(2), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12262
Zhu, Y., Liu, X., Xiao, Y., & Sindakis, S. (2024). Mathematics Anxiety and Problem-Solving Proficiency Among High School Students: Unraveling the Complex Interplay in the Knowledge Economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(4), 20516–20546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01688-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01688-w
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wahyu Kusumaningtyas, Yunita Widya Putri, Riski Rusmalinda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
