Student Verbal Impoliteness in Discussion-Based Mathematics Classrooms: A Qualitative Study on Interaction and Participation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64268/jtse.v1i2.108Keywords:
Discussion-based learning, Mathematics classroom interaction, Qualitative research, Student participation, Verbal impolitenessAbstract
Background: Discussion-based mathematics instruction is intended to promote shared reasoning and active participation, yet its effectiveness depends on the quality of students’ verbal interaction. When communication shifts toward interruption, dismissive remarks, or inappropriate tone, the collaborative nature of discussion may be weakened.
Aims: This study explores how verbal impoliteness is enacted by students during discussion-based mathematics learning and investigates its influence on classroom interaction and participation.
Methods: A descriptive qualitative approach was applied in an eighth-grade mathematics classroom implementing group discussions. Data were generated through direct classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with selected students and the teacher, and supporting documentation such as field notes. The data were examined through thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns of impolite verbal behavior and their effects on interaction.
Result: The study found that verbal impoliteness commonly appeared in the form of unsolicited interruptions, sarcastic or demeaning comments, and raised intonation when responding to peers. These behaviors disrupted the continuity of discussion, discouraged some students from contributing, and led to unequal participation within groups. As a result, interaction became dominated by a limited number of voices, while others withdrew from the exchange of ideas during mathematical problem solving.
Conclusion: Verbal impoliteness significantly shapes the quality of interaction and participation in discussion-based mathematics classrooms. Establishing shared norms of respectful dialogue and consistently guiding students toward constructive communication are essential for sustaining inclusive and meaningful mathematical discussion.
References
AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, S., & MohdZuki, S. F. (2024). Developing Soft Skills in the Artificial Intelligence Era: Communication, Business Writing, and Composition Skills. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 4(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2024.0496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2024.0496
Aljohani, N. J., & Hanna, B. E. (2023). ‘I do not know what’s that word in English, but I will tell you about my cousin’: EFL learners’ communication strategies in online oral discussion tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 51(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2021.1989017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2021.1989017
Andersson, M., & McIntyre, D. (2025). Can ChatGPT recognize impoliteness? An exploratory study of the pragmatic awareness of a large language model. Journal of Pragmatics, 239, 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.001
Asimakopoulos, G., Antonopoulou, H., Giotopoulos, K., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Democratic Processes and Citizen Participation. Societies, 15(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020040
Beschieru, M. (2021). Changes in the Classroom Discourse: Negative Politeness and Impoliteness. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 13(2), 37–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2021-0012
Binlibdah, S. (2024). Investigating the Role of Artificial Intelligence to Measure Consumer Efficiency: The Use of Strategic Communication and Personalized Media Content. Journalism and Media, 5(3), 1142–1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5030073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5030073
Cayubit, R. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x
Çelik, A., & Arslan, S. (2025). Lower secondary students’ cognitive, social and instructional mathematical experiences in instant messaging environments. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2483489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2483489
Chang, C.-C., Hsu, W.-C., Chang Chien, X., & Kuo, H.-C. (2025). Playing with the future past: Scaffolding Taiwanese high school students’ historical causal thinking through dialogic game-based learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101748
Chen, C.-M., & Tsao, H.-W. (2021). An instant perspective comparison system to facilitate learners’ discussion effectiveness in an online discussion process. Computers & Education, 164, 104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104037
Cheung, A. (2021). Synchronous online teaching, a blessing or a curse? Insights from EFL primary students’ interaction during online English lessons. System, 100, 102566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102566
Cho, W. (2023). Critical Language Pedagogy in a Neoliberal Space (Hagwǒn) in Korea: Student Awareness and Engagement in Critical Dialogue. Critical Education, 14(3), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v14i3.186703
Drageset, O. G., & Ell, F. (2024). Using positioning theory to think about mathematics classroom talk. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(3), 353–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10295-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10295-0
Elhilal, A. (2025). Cracking the math code: The impact of flipped classroom on problem-solving, digital fluency and self-directed learning. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2580767. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2580767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2580767
Erath, K., Ingram, J., Moschkovich, J., & Prediger, S. (2021). Designing and enacting instruction that enhances language for mathematics learning: A review of the state of development and research. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01213-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01213-2
Erdemir, E., & Brutt-Griffler, J. (2022). Vocabulary Development Through Peer Interactions in Early Childhood: A Case Study of an Emergent Bilingual Child in Preschool. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(3), 834–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1722058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1722058
France, A. (2021). Teachers Using Dialogue to Support Science Learning in the Primary Classroom. Research in Science Education, 51(3), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09863-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09863-3
Kim, J. (2024). Leading teachers’ perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8693–8724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12109-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12109-5
Kitsantas, A., Cleary, T. J., Whitehead, A., & Cheema, J. (2021). Relations among classroom context, student motivation, and mathematics literacy: A social cognitive perspective. Metacognition and Learning, 16(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09249-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09249-1
Kontorovich, I. (2021). Minding mathematicians’ discourses in investigations of their feedback on students’ proofs: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10035-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10035-2
Lapidot-Lefler, N. (2025). Teacher Responsiveness in Inclusive Education: A Participatory Study of Pedagogical Practice, Well-Being, and Sustainability. Sustainability, 17(7), 2919. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072919
Larsen, A., & Madsen, L. M. (2025). Investigating language and inequality in a seemingly equal educational context. Multilingua, 44(6), 755–786. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2024-0221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2024-0221
Mamas, C., Bjorklund Jr., P., Cohen, S. R., & Holtzman, C. (2023). New friends and cohesive classrooms: A research practice partnership to promote inclusion. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100256
McNab, N. C., & Mavrou, I. (2025). How we are versus how we are feeling: The role of emotional intelligence and mood in reactions to impoliteness in L1 and L2. Journal of Pragmatics, 246, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.001
Nadeem, M. (2024). Distributed leadership in educational contexts: A catalyst for school improvement. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100835 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100835
Nama, S., & Ayalon, M. (2024). Exploring change in secondary mathematics teachers’ noticing of argumentation through experiencing peer-assessment strategies. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(6), 915–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09586-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09586-3
Pan, Z. (2025). Verbal Humor and Impoliteness in Student-Teacher Relationships—Zhaoyi Pan, 2025. Sage Open. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/21582440251399788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251399788
Park, D., & Ramirez, G. (2022). Frustration in the Classroom: Causes and Strategies to Help Teachers Cope Productively. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 1955–1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09707-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09707-z
Paul, J. A., Sinha, M., & Cochran, J. D. (2023). Instruments to assess students’ critical thinking—A qualitative approach. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 21(3), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12295
Planas, N., Adler, J., & Mwadzaangati, L. (2023). What is mathematics teaching talk for? A response based on three sites of practice in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(3), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01452-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01452-5
Protassova, E., & Yelenevskaya, M. (2024). Changes in the immigrant Russian-speaking family language policy during the war in Ukraine. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1385420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1385420
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-pandemic Challenges for Higher Education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1
Rapanta, C., Vrikki, M., & Evagorou, M. (2021). Preparing culturally literate citizens through dialogue and argumentation: Rethinking citizenship education. The Curriculum Journal, 32(3), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.95 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.95
Sagoo, M. G., Lam, P. Y., Sharma, T., Arora, A., Siddiqui, M., Adeniyi, A. M., Brassett, C., Noel, G., Wingate, R., McWatt, S., Stearns, D., Garcia Souto, P., & Wu, A. (2025). Evaluating group dynamics through peer assessment during a global student collaboration of interprofessional healthcare education: A longitudinal study across 33 universities. Anatomical Sciences Education, 18(5), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70026
Salbaş, H., & Ekmekçi, Assoc. Prof. Dr. E. (2025). The impact of classroom environment on students’ willingness to communicate in foreign language learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 129, 102517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102517
Schwarts, G., Elbaum-Cohen, A., Pöhler, B., Prediger, S., Arcavi, A., & Karsenty, R. (2023). The servants of two discourses: How novice facilitators draw on their mathematics teaching experience. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10182-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10182-0
Severe, E., Stalnaker, J., Hubbard, A., Hafen, C. H., & Bailey, E. G. (2024). To participate or not to participate? A qualitative investigation of students’ complex motivations for verbal classroom participation. PLOS ONE, 19(2), e0297771. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297771
Siegel-Stechler, K. (2023). “Conversation is everything”: How teachers and students create environments where open discussion can thrive. Theory & Research in Social Education, 51(4), 626–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2023.2219638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2023.2219638
Smit, R., Bachmann, P., Dober, H., & Hess, K. (2024). Feedback levels and their interaction with the mathematical reasoning process. The Curriculum Journal, 35(2), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.221
Stewart, T. T., & Jansky, T. A. (2022). Novice teachers and embracing struggle: Dialogue and reflection in professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education: Leadership and Professional Development, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tatelp.2022.100002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tatelp.2022.100002
Triyono, S., Sahayu, W., & Yuliana, F. (2025). Politeness and impoliteness by teachers and students in technology-assisted teaching and learning process. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.17509/azngyy22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/azngyy22
Valencia Mazzanti, C., & Karsli-Calamak, E. (2022). “Kind of interrupting”: Teachers of young children understanding mathematics learning and linguistic diversity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 35(2), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1829740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1829740
Walsh, M. E., & Matsumura, L. C. (2025). Negotiating Ideologies of Learning and Learner Ability in Teacher Reflection: Examining Growth and Tension in Dialogic Classroom Discussion Quality. Cognition and Instruction, 43(4), 316–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2025.2523758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2025.2523758
Wilkerson, M. H., Kim, J., Lee, H. S., Stokes, D. J., & Ferrell, M. (2025). How Teachers Envision Using Data Visualization Discussion Tasks in Classroom Instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(7), 2653–2687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10521-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10521-y
Wodak, R., Culpeper, J., & Semino, E. (2021). Shameless normalisation of impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences. Discourse & Society, 32(3), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977217
Zengilowski, A., Lee, J., Gaines, R. E., Park, H., Choi, E., & Schallert, D. L. (2023). The collective classroom “we”: The role of students’ sense of belonging on their affective, cognitive, and discourse experiences of online and face-to-face discussions. Linguistics and Education, 73, 101142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101142
Zhou, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Ryan, Z., Stiso, C., Murphy, D., Danish, J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2025). Disagreeing softly: Supporting students in managing disagreement in peer critique. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 20(2), 249–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09438-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09438-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Carmelita Tali Wangge, Maria Fatima Wio, Angela Merici Bhebhe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
