A Longitudinal Analysis of Cognitive Transitions: A Case Study on the Evolution of Pre-operational to Concrete Operational Mindsets in Children Aged 5–7
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64268/jtse.v2i1.126Keywords:
Cognitive Development, Concrete Operational Stage, Longitudinal Case Study, Pre-operational Stage, Qualitative researchAbstract
Background: The transition from pre-operational to concrete operational thinking is a fundamental stage in children's cognitive development. Despite its importance, classroom practices often prioritize early mastery of literacy and numeracy through memorization, with limited attention to children's developmental readiness. As a result, learning difficulties at an early age are frequently interpreted as indicators of limited ability rather than as part of a normal cognitive transition.
Aims: This study explores how a child's cognitive processes changed between the ages of five and seven, with particular attention to the development of logical reasoning during the transition from the pre-operational to the concrete operational stage.
Methods: A qualitative longitudinal single-case study was conducted over a two-year period involving one purposively selected child. Data were gathered through participatory observations, Piagetian clinical interviews, and an analysis of learning portfolios. The data were examined using a constant comparative approach, and evidence from multiple sources was triangulated to strengthen the trustworthiness of the findings.
Results: The child gradually shifted from intuitive, perception-based responses to more systematic and logical reasoning. Initial dependence on concrete representations in arithmetic was replaced by conceptual understanding, accompanied by stronger metacognitive awareness, independent reasoning, and more reflective approaches to problem solving.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that early academic difficulties should be interpreted within the context of cognitive development rather than as evidence of low intellectual ability. Recognizing individual developmental trajectories can help educators design learning experiences that encourage reasoning, inquiry, and conceptual understanding instead of emphasizing memorization alone.
References
Acosta, Y., Alsina, Á., & Pincheira, N. (2024). Computational thinking and repetition patterns in early childhood education: Longitudinal analysis of representation and justification. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 7633–7658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12051-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12051-6
Al-Hashim, A. A., & Alalouch, C. (2025). Structured creativity: Shape grammar as a pedagogical tool for early design learning. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-07-2025-0309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-07-2025-0309
Bati, K. (2022). A systematic literature review regarding computational thinking and programming in early childhood education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2059–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10700-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10700-2
Bîzoi, A.-C., & Bîzoi, C.-G. (2026). Business ethics for Industry 5.0: Creative pedagogies for human-centric futures. The International Journal of Management Education, 24(1), Article 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101316
Buchberger, B. (2023). Automated programming, symbolic computation, machine learning: My personal view. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. http://epub.jku.at/obvulioa/9236809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-023-09894-7
Cherukunnath, D., & Singh, A. P. (2022). Exploring cognitive processes of knowledge acquisition to upgrade academic practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.682628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.682628
Chiong, C., & Lim, L. (2022). Seeing families as policy actors: Exploring higher-order thinking reforms in Singapore through low-income families' perspectives. Journal of Education Policy, 37(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1777468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1777468
Clement, J. J. (2022). Multiple levels of heuristic reasoning processes in scientific model construction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750713
Çoban Sural, Ü., & Yaşar Sağlık, Z. (2026). Operationalizing inclusion through drama: The effects of inclusive children's literature on empathic tendencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1836003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1836003
Cossart, R., & Khazipov, R. (2022). How development sculpts hippocampal circuits and function. Physiological Reviews, 102(1), 343–378. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00044.2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00044.2020
Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., Christou, C., Greiff, S., Makris, N., Vainikainen, M.-P., Golino, H., & Gonida, E. (2023). Cognitive and personality predictors of school performance from preschool to secondary school: An overarching model. Psychological Review, 130(2), 480–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000399
Donovan, B. M., Weindling, M., Salazar, B., Duncan, A., Stuhlsatz, M., & Keck, P. (2021). Genomics literacy matters: Supporting the development of genomics literacy through genetics education could reduce the prevalence of genetic essentialism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), 520–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21670
Goddu, M. K., & Gopnik, A. (2024). The development of human causal learning and reasoning. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3(5), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00300-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00300-5
Hanfstingl, B., Arzenšek, A., Apschner, J., & Gölly, K. I. (2022). Assimilation and accommodation: A systematic review of the last two decades. European Psychologist, 27(4), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000463
Howard, K. A. S., & Ferrari, L. (2022). Social-emotional learning and career development in elementary settings. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 50(3), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1959898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1959898
Jiao, L., Wang, Y., Liu, X., Li, L., Liu, F., Ma, W., Guo, Y., Chen, P., Yang, S., & Hou, B. (2024). Causal inference meets deep learning: A comprehensive survey. Research, 7, Article 0467. https://doi.org/10.34133/research.0467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34133/research.0467
Józsa, K., Amukune, S., Zentai, G., & Barrett, K. C. (2022). School readiness test and intelligence in preschool as predictors of middle school success: Result of an eight-year longitudinal study. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), Article 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030066
Klotzbier, T. J., & Schott, N. (2024). Skillful and strategic navigation in soccer: A motor-cognitive dual-task approach for the evaluation of a dribbling task under different cognitive load conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356892
Konca, A. S. (2022). Digital technology usage of young children: Screen time and families. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01245-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01245-7
Leisman, G., Alfasi, R., D'Angiulli, A., Leisman, G., Alfasi, R., & D'Angiulli, A. (2025). Environment and brain interactions: Typical development of learning and memory networks from fetus to age two. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 24(11). https://doi.org/10.31083/JIN41452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/JIN41452
Michala, M., Novianti, C., & Rosiani, Y. (2026). Fostering inquiry and curiosity: Project-based learning in early childhood science education. Proceedings International Conference of Bunga Bangsa, 4(1), 173–188.
Mualem, R., Morales-Quezada, L., Farraj, R. H., Shance, S., Bernshtein, D. H., Cohen, S., Mualem, L., Salem, N., Yehuda, R. R., Zbedat, Y., Waksman, I., & Biswas, S. (2024). Econeurobiology and brain development in children: Key factors affecting development, behavioral outcomes, and school interventions. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1376075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1376075
Mufrihah, A. (2021). The development of school readiness of kindergarten students through storytelling. Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 6(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v6i1.1336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v6i1.1336
Ncube, M., & Luneta, K. (n.d.). Concept-based instruction: Improving learner performance in mathematics through conceptual understanding. Pythagoras, 46(1), Article 815. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v46i1.815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v46i1.815
Normatovna, M. M. (2026). The pedagogical essence of inductive methods and their role in cognitive development. Next Scientists EIJP, 6(4), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-04-31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-04-31
Odegard, T. N., & Gierka, M. V. (2026). The science of reading meets the science of learning: Memory systems, structured literacy, and the role of AI. Annals of Dyslexia, 76(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-025-00345-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-025-00345-y
Park, H.-J. (2021). Does filial piety still matter? A filiality-based perspective on intergenerational solidarity and cooperation. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 19(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2021.1868232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2021.1868232
Piaget's stages of cognitive development: A guide. (n.d.). Structural Learning. Retrieved July 2, 2026, from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/jean-piagets-theory-of-cognitive-development-and-active-classrooms
Schlatter, E., Molenaar, I., & Lazonder, A. W. (2021). Learning scientific reasoning: A latent transition analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 92, Article 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102043
Shvarts, A. (2025). From movement to mathematics: A systemic theory of higher order cognition and its development. Human Development, 302–327. https://doi.org/10.1159/000548604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000548604
Ssemugenyi, F. (2023). Teaching and learning methods compared: A pedagogical evaluation of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture methods in developing learners' cognitive abilities. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2187943. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2187943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2187943
Sugiasih, I., & Setiowati, E. A. (2016). Studi deskriptif mengenai kemampuan persepsi visual anak usia 3–5 tahun. Jurnal Psikologi Proyeksi, 11, 55–63.
Tunalı, Ö., & Aktürkoğlu, B. (2025). An investigation into the cognitive developmental stages and scientific reasoning characteristics of children aged 7–11. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 38(3), 593–624. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1595025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1595025
Wei, H., Bos, R., & Drijvers, P. (2024). Developing functional thinking: From concrete to abstract through an embodied design. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00142-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00142-z
Whitehead, H. L., & Hawes, Z. (2023). Cognitive foundations of early mathematics: Investigating the unique contributions of numerical, executive function, and spatial skills. Journal of Intelligence, 11(12), Article 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11120221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11120221
Widana, I. W., & Widyastiti, N. M. R. (2023). Model learning cycle 5E untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika. Journal of Education Action Research, 7(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v7i2.59337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v7i2.59337
Williamson, E. (2023). The effectiveness of project-based learning in developing critical thinking skills among high school students. European Journal of Education, 1(1), 1–11.
Zamzami, M. A., & Zamzami, M. R. A. (2025). Peran strategi metakognitif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman materi pembelajaran pada siswa sekolah dasar. Primary Education Journals (Jurnal Ke-SD-An), 5(1), 415–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36636/primed.v5i1.6747
Zeeshan, D. M., Shaheen, L., & Malik, D. N. (2025). A study to investigate the impact of competency-based education method on students' learning outcomes as compared to traditional education method at elementary level. Journal of Childhood Literacy and Societal Issues, 4(2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.71085/joclsi.04.02.81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.71085/joclsi.04.02.81
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Novi Ayu Kristiana Dewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
