Enhancing Managerial Efficiency Through a Digital Fingerprint Attendance and Monitoring Dashboard: A Community Empowerment Initiative in the TEFA Integrated Agriculture Unit

Authors

  • Rosaliana Putri Anggraeni Politeknik Negeri Jember, Indonesia
  • Mukhsin Politeknik Negeri Jember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64268/josce.v1i3.70

Keywords:

Community Empowerment, Digital Attendance System, Fingerprint Technology, Managerial Efficiency, Monitoring Dashboard

Abstract

Background: Digital transformation in community-based vocational units remains uneven, particularly in agricultural practice settings where daily operations depend heavily on manual labor. Inefficiencies in attendance monitoring and the absence of real-time managerial data often hinder decision-making and limit empowerment opportunities for casual workers. These challenges motivated the implementation of a digital fingerprint attendance system supported by an integrated monitoring dashboard in the TEFA Integrated Agriculture Unit.

Aims: The study aims to evaluate how the introduction of a digital attendance and monitoring system influences managerial efficiency while strengthening the foundation for community empowerment among daily workers engaged in agricultural activities.

Methods: A mixed-method approach was adopted, integrating observational data, pre- and post-implementation attendance records, and structured interviews with supervisors and casual workers. Quantitative data captured punctuality trends, consistency of attendance, and time-based operational efficiency, while qualitative insights were used to interpret changes in worker engagement and perceptions of digital tools.

Results: Findings indicate a substantial improvement in attendance accuracy, reduced reporting delays, and enhanced managerial oversight through real-time dashboard visualization. Supervisors reported greater clarity in workforce allocation, while workers experienced increased transparency regarding working hours. Although empowerment outcomes were not uniform across individuals, most participants acknowledged that the system encouraged discipline and fairness in workload recognition.

Conclusion: The introduction of a digital fingerprint attendance system demonstrates meaningful progress toward strengthening managerial efficiency in community-based vocational units. More importantly, the intervention provides an early but significant foundation for community empowerment by fostering transparency, reinforcing equitable work practices, and promoting technological readiness among casual workers. The study suggests that digital tools, when integrated with ongoing capacity-building efforts, can evolve into broader empowerment mechanisms that improve not only administrative efficiency but also workers’ sense of participation, agency, and long-term inclusion in agricultural digitalization initiatives. Future replication in similar rural contexts is promising, provided that training, responsiveness to local needs, and sustained community engagement remain central.

References

Ajith, V., Reshma, A. S., Mohan, R., & Ramesh, M. V. (2022). Empowering communities in addressing drinking water challenges using a systematic, participatory and adaptive approach and sustainable PPP model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 121970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121970

Baldin, M., Breunig, T., Cue, R., De Vries, A., Doornink, M., Drevenak, J., Fourdraine, R., George, R., Goodling, R., & Greenfield, R. (2021). Integrated decision support systems (IDSS) for dairy farming: A discussion on how to improve their sustained adoption. 11(7), 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072025

Burr, V., King, N., & Heckmann, M. (2022). The qualitative analysis of repertory grid data: Interpretive Clustering. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(3), 678–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1794088

Chen, L., Tong, T. W., Tang, S., & Han, N. (2022). Governance and Design of Digital Platforms: A Review and Future Research Directions on a Meta-Organization. Journal of Management, 48(1), 147–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211045023

Chen, W., Jian, I. Y., Ng, E., & Mo, K. H. (2025). “All concerns me”: Collaborative governance in pre-regeneration of public rental housing in Hong Kong from the boundary-work perspective. Land Use Policy, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107819

Chen, Y., Richter, J. I., & Patel, P. C. (2021). Decentralized Governance of Digital Platforms. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1305–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320916755

Cui, M., Qian, J., & Cui, L. (2022). Developing precision agriculture through creating information processing capability in rural China. 92, 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.04.002

Dai, J., & Azhar, A. (2024). Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development. Public Administration and Development, 44(4), 358–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2071

Dolan, S., Nowell, L., & Moules, N. J. (2023). Interpretive description in applied mixed methods research: Exploring issues of fit, purpose, process, context, and design. Nursing Inquiry, 30(3), e12542. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12542

Doshi, A. R., & Schmidt, W. (2024). Soft Governance Across Digital Platforms Using Transparency. Strategy Science, 9(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0006

Dushkova, D., & Ivlieva, O. (2024). Empowering communities to act for a change: A review of the community empowerment programs towards sustainability and resilience. 16(19), 8700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198700

Kim, D., Yagi, H., & Kiminami, A. (2023). Exploring information uses for the successful implementation of farm management information system: A case study on a paddy rice farm enterprise in Japan. 3, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100119

Klinsky, S., & Sagar, A. D. (2022). The why, what and how of capacity building: Some explorations. Climate Policy, 22(5), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2065059

Leong, C., Pan, S. L., Leidner, D. E., & Huang, J.-S. (2019). Platform leadership: Managing boundaries for the network growth of digital platforms. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(10), 1531–1565. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00577

Maza, Y., Shechter, E., Pur Eizenberg, N., Segev, E. G., & Flugelman, M. Y. (2016). Physician empowerment programme; A unique workshop for physician-managers of community clinics. BMC Medical Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0786-y

Narasimhan, M., Gutiérrez, P. M., Osborne, Z., Habanyama, M., Worster, K., Martin, C., & Kaida, A. (2024). Community engagement in WHO guideline development. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 102(10), 760. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.291579

Picavet, M. E. B., De Macedo, L. S. V., Bellezoni, R. A., & Puppim De Oliveira, J. A. (2023). How can Transnational Municipal Networks foster local collaborative governance regimes for environmental management? Environmental Management, 71(3), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01685-w

Pregoner, J. D. (2024). Research approaches in education: A comparison of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. IMCC Journal of Science, 4(2), 31–36.

Sharma, S., Kar, A. K., Gupta, M. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Janssen, M. (2022). Digital citizen empowerment: A systematic literature review of theories and development models. Information Technology for Development, 28(4), 660–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2046533

Singh, H. P., & Singh, B. (2023). Knowledge exchange and capacity building of farmers on enhancing water productivity – a case study of Odisha, India. Acta Hortic., 1373, 231–238. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1373.30

Soares, S., Hoffmeister, L. V., Fernandes, M. de F., Henriques, A., & Costa, A. (2024). The use of digital technologies in the promotion of health literacy and empowerment of informal caregivers: Scoping review. 7, e54913. https://doi.org/10.2196/54913

Turin, T. C., Chowdhury, N., Haque, S., Rumana, N., Rahman, N., & Lasker, M. A. A. (2021). Involving im/migrant community members for knowledge co-creation: The greater the desired involvement, the greater the need for capacity building. BMJ Global Health, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007602

Wiltshire, G., & Ronkainen, N. (2021). A realist approach to thematic analysis: Making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential and dispositional themes. Journal of Critical Realism, 20(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2021.1894909

Wright, C., Ritter, L. J., & Wisse Gonzales, C. (2022). Cultivating a collaborative culture for ensuring sustainable development goals in higher education: An integrative case study. 14(3), 1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031273

Yahia, N. B., Eljaoued, W., Saoud, N. B. B., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2021). Towards sustainable collaborative networks for smart cities co-governance. 56, 102037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.11.005

Downloads

Published

2025-12-27

How to Cite

Putri Anggraeni, R. ., & Mukhsin, M. (2025). Enhancing Managerial Efficiency Through a Digital Fingerprint Attendance and Monitoring Dashboard: A Community Empowerment Initiative in the TEFA Integrated Agriculture Unit. Journal of Supply Chain and Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.64268/josce.v1i3.70