Optimizing Raw Material Inventory Efficiency in Small-Scale Agroindustry Using the Economic Order Quantity Model: Evidence from a Milkfish Floss Enterprise in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64268/josce.v2i1.111Keywords:
Agroindustry, Economic Order Quantity, Inventory Control, Milkfish Processing, Supply Chain EfficiencyAbstract
Background: Efficient raw material inventory management is essential for maintaining production continuity and minimizing operational costs in small-scale agroindustries. Many micro and small enterprises still rely on conventional purchasing practices without systematic inventory planning, which often leads to overstocking, stock shortages, and increased storage costs. In the fish processing sector, particularly in milkfish floss production, the perishable nature of raw materials further increases the importance of accurate inventory control. The application of quantitative inventory models such as the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) approach can provide a structured framework to determine optimal ordering decisions and improve operational efficiency in small agroindustrial enterprises.
Aims: This study aims to analyze raw material inventory control in a small-scale milkfish floss enterprise and evaluate the effectiveness of the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model in determining optimal order quantity, reorder point, safety stock, and total inventory cost.
Methods: A quantitative case study approach was applied using operational data collected from January to December 2024 at a milkfish floss enterprise located in Situbondo, Indonesia. The analysis utilized the EOQ model to calculate optimal order quantity, ordering frequency, safety stock, reorder point, and total inventory cost. Supporting calculations were performed using inventory management analysis procedures to compare the efficiency of the EOQ approach with the existing conventional ordering system.
Result: The results indicate that the enterprise purchased 770 kg of milkfish raw materials with an annual usage of 760 kg and an ordering frequency of 65 times under the conventional system. Using the EOQ model, the optimal order quantity was determined to be 65.25 kg per order with an estimated ordering frequency of 11.65 times per year and an average order cycle of approximately 19.05 days. The recommended safety stock was 12.228 kg, while the reorder point was calculated at 15.648 kg. The implementation of EOQ reduced the total inventory cost to IDR 244,668.75 compared to the conventional system cost of IDR 704,103.75, resulting in a cost saving of IDR 458,435.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that the EOQ model provides a practical and efficient approach for improving inventory management in small-scale agroindustries. By determining optimal order quantities and establishing systematic reorder policies, the model helps reduce excessive ordering frequency, minimize inventory-related costs, and prevent raw material shortages that could disrupt production processes. The study highlights the importance of adopting quantitative inventory management tools within small agroindustrial enterprises to enhance operational efficiency and cost control. Furthermore, the results provide empirical evidence that structured inventory planning can significantly improve supply chain stability in small-scale food processing industries. The adoption of EOQ-based inventory management is therefore recommended as a strategic approach to support sustainable production management and operational resilience in small agroindustry systems.
References
Abbas, H., Zhao, L., Gong, X., Jiang, M., & Faiz, T. (2024). Environmental and economic influences of postharvest losses across the fish-food products supply chain in the developing regions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(11), 28335–28366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03814-9
Bouncken, R. B., Czakon, W., & Schmitt, F. (2025). Purposeful sampling and saturation in qualitative research methodologies: Recommendations and review. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00881-2
Choque Llerena, A. A., Salinas Rojas, A. P., Aguilar Franco, J. A., Villanuena Delgado, C. M., & Caipo Huacasi, M. S. (2025). DEVELOPMENT OF THE SCOR MODEL IN THE EFFICIENCY OF AGROINDUSTRY INVENTORY MANAGEMENT: CASE STUDY OF THE AGROINDUSTRY LYOPHILIZER COMPANY, AREQUIPA. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 7(3), 2105–2112. https://doi.org/10.24874/PES07.03B.011
ERP System for Inventory Management in an Agro-Industrial Company. (2025). TEM Journal, 14(4), 3313–3319. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM144-39
Fajardo-Ariza, T., García-Medina, I. D., Castillo-Sanabria, L. A., Nieto-Veloza, A., & Zuluaga-Domínguez, C. M. (2026). Socio-productive diagnosis and solar dryer co-design for post-harvest loss reduction in rural communities. Renewable Energy, 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2026.125259
Figurek, A., & Thrassou, A. (2023). An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Development in Agri-Food SMEs. Sustainability, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129387
Garcez, A., Rodrigues, M., Franco, M., Oliveira, A., Costa, J., & Cabeleira, C. (2026). What You Need to Know About Life Cycle Assessment in the “Agri-Food Sector” for Sustainable Business Strategies in SMEs: A Bibliometric Analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(2), 2295–2307. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70288
Gomaa, A. H. (2025). Achieving operational excellence in manufacturing supply chains using lean six sigma: A case study approach. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 17(2), 614–648. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-03-2024-0045
Guerra, J. D., Palomino, G., Yildiz, O., Macassi, I. A., & Alvarez, J. C. (2025). Re-Designing Business Process Models for Enhancing Sustainability in Spinach Production Through Lean Tools with Digital Transformation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135673
Huerta-Soto, R., Ramirez-Asis, E., Tarazona-Jiménez, J., Nivin-Vargas, L., Norabuena-Figueroa, R., Guzman-Avalos, M., & Reyes-Reyes, C. (2023). RETRACTED: Predictable inventory management within dairy supply chain operations. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 53(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-01-2023-0051
Ji, S., Lu, B., & Li, P. (2025). Some Reflections on Modern Science of Agricultural Product Quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 58(9), 1830–1844. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.09.012
Khan, M. A., & Mahajan, R. (2025). Exploring factors influencing circular economy adoption and firm-level practices in the agribusiness sector: An exploratory study of Indian firms. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(4), 9039–9069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04267-w
Laili, N., Djatna, T., Indrasti, N. S., & Yani, M. (2024). Optimization of industrial symbiosis in coffee-based eco-industrial park design. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 10(2), 621–642. https://doi.org/10.22035/gjesm.2024.02.13
Leão, R., Ijatuyi, E. J., & Goulao, L. F. (2023). How Public Procurement Mechanisms Can Be Used as a Tool for Developing Pro-Poor Food Value Chains: From Entry Points to Interventions. Sustainability, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129152
Leitão, F. O., Paiva, E. L., & Thomé, K. M. (2023). Agribusiness capabilities and performance: A systematic literature review and research agenda. British Food Journal, 126(2), 595–622. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2022-1143
Manggala, P. W., Machfud, M., & Sailah, I. (2024). Analysis of Supply Chain Performance Improvement in the Fish Processing Industry. Industria: Jurnal Teknologi Dan Manajemen Agroindustri, 13(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.industria.2024.013.01.4
Marcone, M. R. (2025). Sustainable supply chain in a new technological era: The case of the Italian agrifood sector. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(11), 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2024-0421
Meilizar, Hadiguna, R. A., Santosa, & Nofialdi. (2024). SUPPLY CHAIN CONCEPTUAL MODEL TO OPTIMIZE A LOCAL FOOD AGROINDUSTRY FROM THE COCONUT MILK PROCESSING. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science, 6(1), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v6i1.5820
Muhsin, M., Cahyanti, I. S., Novita, D., Rahayu, Y. S., & Rasban, S. (2024). Adaptation of the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Model in the Perspective of Maqasid Shari’a. Al-’Adalah, 21(2), 479–506. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v21i2.26535
Nappi, V., & Kelly, K. (2021). Proposing a performance framework for innovation measurement: An exploratory case-based research. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(5), 1829–1853. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2020-0332
Paillin, D. B., Machfud, Hardjomidjojo, H., & Romli, M. (2025). Analysis of Tuna Loin Agroindustry Supply Chain Configuration: Case Study in Maluku Province, Indonesia. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2025.403376
Rambe, P., & Khaola, P. (2021). The impact of innovation on agribusiness competitiveness: The mediating role of technology transfer and productivity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(3), 741–773. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2020-0180
Salah, A., Çağlar, D., & Zoubi, K. (2023). The Impact of Production and Operations Management Practices in Improving Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Integration. Sustainability, 15(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015140
Schmidt, D., Casagranda, L. F., Butturi, M. A., & Sellitto, M. A. (2024). Digital Technologies, Sustainability, and Efficiency in Grain Post-Harvest Activities: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031244
Shadkam, E., & Irannezhad, E. (2025). A comprehensive review of simulation optimization methods in agricultural supply chains and transition towards an agent-based intelligent digital framework for agriculture 4.0. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 143, 109930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109930
Shao, D., & Marwa, N. (2025). Examining the role of artificial intelligence in post-harvest management for enhanced food security: A critical review. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101286
Sun, Z., Li, F., & Liu, Y. (2026). Dual Drivers and Sustainability Tension: How Does Agricultural Supply Chain Finance Affect Core Enterprise Performance? Sustainability (Switzerland), 18(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010433
Suryaningrat, I. B., Wibowo, Y., Ansori, L., Kuswardhani, N., & Purnomo, B. H. (2024). Supply Chain Management Performance Analysis Using SCOR Method: A Case of Coffee Agroindustry in Indonesia. AIP Conf. Proc., 3176(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0222694
Suthiluk, P., Khantachawana, A., Phattarapattamawong, S., Srilaong, V., Setha, S., Pongprasert, N., Konsue, N., & Boonprong, S. (2025). An Integrated Framework for Zero-Waste Processing and Carbon Footprint Estimation in ‘Phulae’ Pineapple Systems. Agriculture (Switzerland), 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15151623
Valdés, R. (2024). Sustainable Food Value Chains: Approaches to Transaction Costs in Agro-Alimentary Systems of Developing Countries—A Chile Case Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103952
Vlachos, I., & Malindretos, G. (2023). Supply chain redesign in the aquaculture supply chain: A longitudinal case study. Production Planning & Control, 34(8), 748–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1959663
Wicaksono, T., & Illés, C. B. (2022). From resilience to satisfaction: Defining supply chain solutions for agri-food SMEs through quality approach. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0263393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263393
Zou, Y., Shi, M., Chen, Z., Deng, Z., Lei, Z., Zeng, Z., Yang, S., Tong, H., Xiao, L., & Zhou, W. (2025). ESGReveal: An LLM-based approach for extracting structured data from ESG reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 489, 144572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144572
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ainur Rahman, Andi M Ismail

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.