Religious Culture as Informal Governance in Public Schools: Rethinking Normativity, Institutional Neutrality, and Everyday Regulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64268/lca.v1i2.80Keywords:
Everyday regulation, Informal governance, Institutional neutrality, Legal pluralism, Religious cultureAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine how religious culture operates as a form of informal governance within public school institutions. Rather than treating religiosity as a pedagogical or moral variable, the article reframes religious culture as a normative system that structures behavior, authority, and compliance in everyday institutional life. The study interrogates how such informal norms interact with the principle of institutional neutrality that formally characterizes public education.
Method: The research adopts a qualitative socio-legal approach, combining document analysis, institutional observations, and semi-structured interviews with school administrators, teachers, and students. Data are analyzed through thematic coding informed by theories of normativity, informal regulation, and legal pluralism. This approach allows the study to trace how cultural norms are translated into routine practices without being codified as formal rules.
Findings: The findings reveal that religious culture functions as an effective regulatory mechanism that shapes conduct, expectations, and disciplinary practices within public schools. Although these norms lack formal legal status, they operate with a high degree of compliance and moral authority. The study identifies a dynamic tension between formal claims of neutrality and the everyday enforcement of religiously informed norms, demonstrating how informal governance fills regulatory gaps left by formal law.
Significance: This study contributes to socio-legal scholarship by expanding the understanding of governance beyond formal legal frameworks. It highlights how culture-based normativity operates as a parallel regulatory system in public institutions, offering a nuanced perspective on law–culture interaction. The findings are significant for debates on legal pluralism, institutional neutrality, and the regulation of everyday life in multicultural societies.
References
Abildinova, Z., Gülerce, H., Aubakirov, Y., & Sarkulova, M. (2023). Exploring the Intersections of Online and Offline Mediums: Navigating the Post-Pandemic Leisure Culture, Religious Dimensions, and Leisure Class in Kazakhstan. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 13(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.132.19
Ackerly, B., Cabrera, L., Forman, F., Johnson, G. F., Tenove, C., & Wiener, A. (2024). Unearthing grounded normative theory: Practices and commitments of empirical research in political theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 27(2), 156–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1894020
Afiouni, F., Makarem, Y., Mechleb, C., & Darwish, H. (2025). The Interplay of Power and Legal Consciousness: HR Managers’ Insights on Multi‐Level Barriers to Reporting Workplace Sexual Harassment. Human Resource Management Journal, 1748-8583.70025. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.70025
Agung, D. A. G., Nasih, A. M., & Kurniawan, B. (2024). Local wisdom as a model of interfaith communication in creating religious harmony in Indonesia. 9, 100827.
Artis, A., Ottaviani, F., & Ribeiro, L. (2025). Informal governance and day-to-day management: Mechanisms for inclusion and diversity in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Management and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-025-09769-5
Baronchelli, A. (2024). Shaping new norms for AI. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379(1897), 20230028. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0028
Benn, J. A. (2015). Tea in China: A religious and cultural history. University of Hawaii Press.
Boéri, J., & Giustini, D. (2024). Qualitative research in crisis: A narrative-practice methodology to delve into the discourse and action of the unheard in the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative Research, 24(2), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941231155620
Bosse, G. (2022). Does the EU have moral authority? A communicative action perspective on sanctions. 10(1), 16–25.
Brickhill, M., Andrews, G., & Nieuwoudt, J. (2025). Developing Student Agency Towards Academic Integrity Through an Educative Approach: Exploring Students’ Experiences and Perspectives. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(3), 951–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09567-y
Brigg, M. (2017). Rebalancing power and culture?: The case of alternative dispute resolution. In R. Provost (Ed.), Culture in the Domains of Law (pp. 247–265). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316681060.010
Canfield, M. (2025). The promises and tensions of socio-legal participatory action research. International Journal of Law in Context, 21(4), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552325100219
Casanovas, P., de Koker, L., & Hashmi, M. (2022). Law, socio-legal governance, the internet of things, and industry 4.0: A middle-out/inside-out approach. 5(1), 64–91.
Dizon, M. A. C. (2024). Socio-legal study of technology: A norms and values approach to hacking and encryption law and policy. 52, 105958.
Evered, E. Ö., & Evered, K. T. (2016). A geopolitics of drinking: Debating the place of alcohol in early republican Turkey. Political Geography, 50, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.06.006
Govindan, P. (2022). How do informal norms affect rule compliance: Experimental evidence. 96, 101795.
Higgins, E. M., Smith, J., & Swartz, K. (2022). “We keep the nightmares in their cages”: Correctional culture, identity, and the warped badge of honor*. Criminology, 60(3), 429–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12306
Hirsch, J. S. (2008). Catholics using contraceptives: Religion, family planning, and interpretive agency in rural Mexico. Studies in Family Planning, 39(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00156.x
Kalkstein, D. A., Hook, C. J., Hard, B. M., & Walton, G. M. (2023). Social norms govern what behaviors come to mind—And what do not. 124(6), 1203.
Klemsdal, L., & Wittusen, C. (2023). Agency in compliance with institutions: The case of professional expert-organizations and politico-ethical agency. Organization, 30(4), 712–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211020461
Koncewicz, T. T. (2024). The politics of integration in retrospect and the supranational mega‐politics of governance and design in prospect: A roadmap. European Law Journal, 30(3), 284–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12520
Lyubimova, G. V. (2017). Modernization of agricultural labour in the culture of siberian old believers. Ural’skij Istoriceskij Vestnik, 55(2), 122–130.
Nelson, L. P. (2015). Material Religion in Early America. In J. Davis, J. A. Greenhill, & J. D. LaFountain (Eds.), A Companion to American Art (pp. 488–506). wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118542644.ch28
Parsons Leigh, J., Moss, S. J., Mizen, S. J., FitzGerald, E. A., Brundin-Mather, R., De Grood, C., Dodds, A., Stelfox, H. T., & Fiest, K. M. (2023). Exploring the influence of behavioural, normative and control beliefs on intentions to adhere to public health guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative interview based study. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 464. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15344-0
Pislegin, N. V. (2016). The udmurt kumyshka: Documentary evidence of everyday life in the latter half of the 18th – 19th cc. Oriental Studies, 27(5), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-27-5-89-95
Sasaki, I., & Baba, S. (2024). Shades of Cultural Marginalization: Cultural Survival and Autonomy Processes. Organization Theory, 5(1), 26317877231221552. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877231221552
Sivonen, M. H., & Syväterä, J. (2023). Formal commitments versus actual practices? Narratives as tools of epistemic governance in the debate over Finnish forestry. Acta Sociologica, 66(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993221099618
Spandler, K. (2025). Rethinking democracy in global network governance: Norm polysemy, pluralism, and agonistic engagement. 1–30.
Stoffelen, A. (2022). Managing people’s (in)ability to be mobile: Geopolitics and the selective opening and closing of borders. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12486
Sumerau, J. E., & Schrock, D. P. (2011). It’s important to show your colors": Counter-heteronormativity in a metropolitan community church. In C. Bobel & S. Kwan (Eds.), Embodied Resistance: Challenging the Norms, Breaking the Rules (pp. 99–110). Vanderbilt University Press.
Wallis, J. J. (2022). An alternative institutional approach to rules, organizations, and development. 82(2), 335–367.
Zorkin, V. D. (2018). Essence of law. Voprosy Filosofii, 1, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440004029-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Leni Levana, Sumiarti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
