Testing the Principles of Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances in the Executive-Legislative Relations of Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64268/jilhs.v1i3.119Keywords:
Checks and Balances, Executive-Legislative Relations, Indonesian Constitution, Political Governance, Separation of PowersAbstract
Background: The relationship between the executive and legislative branches in Indonesia has been a focal point of political discourse, especially in the context of the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances. Despite being integral to democratic governance, these principles face significant challenges in their practical application, often undermined by political dynamics and institutional weaknesses.
Aims: This study aims to critically evaluate the real-world application of separation of powers and checks and balances in the executive-legislative relations of Indonesia. It seeks to explore whether these constitutional principles are being effectively upheld and how their implementation affects the balance of power between these branches.
Methods: Using a normative legal research methodology with a doctrinal approach, this research analyzes primary legal sources, including the Indonesian Constitution and relevant laws, as well as secondary sources such as academic journals and political reports. A qualitative analysis of executive-legislative interactions was conducted, focusing on legislative processes and political maneuvering.
Result: The findings reveal that while the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances are enshrined in Indonesia’s Constitution, their practical application is often compromised. The executive branch exerts significant influence over the legislative process, with checks and balances mechanisms frequently rendered ineffective due to political alliances and power imbalances.
Conclusion: This study concludes that the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances are inadequately implemented in Indonesia’s political system. Reforming these mechanisms is essential for enhancing democratic governance and ensuring greater accountability within the political structure.
References
Achmad Aulia, A. (2025). Disruption in Corruption Eradication in Indonesia. Public Integrity, 27(6), 736–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2025.2455757
Adiguzel, F. S. (2025). Checks and Balances and Institutional Gridlock: Implications for Authoritarianism. Governance, 38(2), e70017. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70017
Ahdout, Z. P. (2022). Enforcement Lawmaking and Judicial Review. Harvard Law Review, 135(4), 937–1006.
Alvian, R. A., & Ardhani, I. (2023). The Politics of Moderate Islam in Indonesia: Between International Pressure and Domestic Contestations. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 61(1), 19–57. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2023.611.19-57
Arifin, F., Maarif, I., Bahri, R. A., Suryana, C., & Nor, M. Z. M. (2025). Ambiguity and Contestation in Legal Standing Restrictions: Rethinking Public Interest and Constitutional Rights in Indonesia. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukurn Dan Konstitusi, 8(2), 395. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13192
Bowie, N., & Renan, D. (2022). The Separation-Of-Powers Counterrevolution. The Yale Law Journal, 131(7), 2020–2125.
Clark, J. (2024). Parties, preferences and influence in legislative decision-making. Party Politics, 30(4), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231169394
Da Ros, L., & Taylor, M. M. (2021). Checks and Balances: The Concept and Its Implications for Corruption. Revista Direito GV, 17, e2120. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202120
Doing, M., Warriyodi, Kartian, D., Ibad, M. I., Aprieyanti, & Fitriani. (2024). Strengthening the Constitutional Law System (Legal Challenges and Strategies in Handling the Social, Economic and Political Crisis in Indonesia) | Journal Equity of Law and Governance. https://ejurnal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/elg/article/view/10260
Farhang, S. (2021). Legislative Capacity & Administrative Power Under Divided Polarization. Daedalus, 150(3), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01859
Fossati, D., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2022). Why democrats abandon democracy: Evidence from four survey experiments. Party Politics, 28(3), 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068821992488
Ginsburg, L. R., Hoben, M., Easterbrook, A., Anderson, R. A., Estabrooks, C. A., & Norton, P. G. (2021). Fidelity is not easy! Challenges and guidelines for assessing fidelity in complex interventions. Trials, 22(1), 372. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05322-5
Hermanto, B., Ibrahim Nur, A., & Subawa, M. (2024). Indonesia parliamentary reform and legislation quality backsliding phenomenon: Case of Indonesia post reformasi. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 12(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2024.2316507
Hidayahtulloh, M. A. (2024). Ideological Contestation and Gender Policy Reforms in Post-Reformasi Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 54(3), 363–386. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2177558
Huchhanavar, S. S. (2023). Conceptualising Judicial Independence and Accountability from a Regulatory Perspective. Oslo Law Review, 9(2), 110–148. https://doi.org/10.18261/olr.9.2.3
Malik, D. A., Gusela, M. D., Azfa, S. H., Fauziansah, S., & Rosidin, U. (2024). Navigating the Labyrinth: A Normative Juridical Analysis of Legal Politics and Policy Formulation in Indonesia. Enigma in Law, 2(1), 75–86. ttps://doi.org/10.61996/law.v2i1.82
Mitra, A., & Pal, S. (2022). Ethnic Diversity, Social Norms and Elite Capture: Theory and Evidence from Indonesia. Economica, 89(356), 947–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12423
Muttaqin, L., Omara, A., Atmoredjo, S., & Ar, M. F. (2025). Is the Legislator in the Constitutional Court? Examining the Tension Between Judiciary and Democracy in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 10(1), 91–134. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v10i1.13494
Roisman, S. G. (2024). Balancing Interests in the Separation of Powers. The University of Chicago Law Review, 91(5), 1331–1410.
Salomo, R. V., & Rahmayanti, K. P. (2023). Progress and Institutional Challenges on Local Governments Performance Accountability System Reform in Indonesia. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231196659. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231196659
Solehudin, R. H. (2023). Indonesia’s Geostrategic Position in Global and Regional Politics: Government Preparation. Revenue Journal: Management and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.61650/rjme.v1i2.434
Sulistafando, R. M., Elviandri, Yulianingrum, A. V., & Hasmiati, R. A. (2025). THE DESIGN OF TERM LIMITATIONS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA’S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MEMBERS: CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY, AND THE CHECKS AND BALANCES MECHANISM. Awang Long Law Review, 7(2), 562–570. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v7i2.1941
Tambunan, D. (2023). Indonesia under threat: The danger of corruption to political legitimacy. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(1), 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911221124965
Tladi, M. (2024). Antagonistic politics and coalitions: South Africa’s local to national landscape. Politikon, 51(3–4), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2025.2488570
Widiarto, A. E., Hassan, M. S., Rusli, M. H. M., & Setiawan, E. B. (2025). The authority relationship of Central and Local Governments in forming laws and regulations: Between Indonesia and Malaysia. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.36629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Novia Syari, Nessa Abelia Putri, Rahmad Aditio, Rudi Santoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
