Reframing Reading Pace as a Learning Strategy: Classroom Evidence of Speed Reading Practices in Indonesian Primary Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64268/jsee.v1i2.25Keywords:
Indonesian Language Education, Learning Outcomes, Reading Skills, Speed ReadingAbstract
Background: Many primary students in Indonesian language classes read too slowly to keep up with lesson demands, which can weaken understanding and reduce achievement. This study treats reading pace as an instructional target by applying structured speed reading practice.
Methods: The study used classroom action research conducted in one fourth grade class in Indonesia over two cycles. Twenty students and their teacher participated. Evidence was gathered from reading speed measures, comprehension tests, observation notes, interviews, and classroom documentation. Quantitative patterns were summarized with descriptive comparisons and percentage gains, while qualitative information was used to describe shifts in participation and learning behavior during reading activities.
Result: After the intervention, students read more efficiently while maintaining stronger understanding of texts. Mean reading speed increased from 120 to 180 words per minute, and comprehension scores improved from 65 percent to 85 percent. Across cycles, progress was sustained, with cycle indicators showing reading speed improvement reaching 80 percent and learning outcomes rising to 80 percent by the second cycle. Classroom observations and interviews also pointed to greater engagement, improved confidence, and more active involvement in reading tasks.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that speed reading can be positioned as a practical classroom strategy to build reading fluency without undermining comprehension. Embedding short, structured speed reading routines in Indonesian language instruction may help students process texts more effectively and support better learning performance.
References
Afifah, W., Soeharto, S., Budiwati, T. R., & Atmantika, Z. H. (2023). Enhancing reading abilities: Exploring the interrelationships among speed, critical, and creative reading through classroom-based action research. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 314–326.
Andrews, S., & Veldre, A. (2021). Wrapping up Sentence Comprehension: The Role of Task Demands and Individual Differences. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1817028
Beatty, A., Berkhout, E., Bima, L., Pradhan, M., & Suryadarma, D. (2021). Schooling progress, learning reversal: Indonesia’s learning profiles between 2000 and 2014. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102436
Bilge, H., & Kalenderoğlu, İ. (2022). The Relationship Between Reading Fluency, Writing Fluency, Speaking Fluency, Reading Comprehension, and Vocabulary. Education and Science, 47(209), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2022.9609
Cagliero, L., Canale, L., & Farinetti, L. (2023). Data-Driven Analysis of Student Engagement in Time-Limited Computer Laboratories. Algorithms, 16(10), 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/a16100464
Chuang, C., & Jamiat, N. (2023). A systematic review on the effectiveness of children’s interactive reading applications for promoting their emergent literacy in the multimedia context. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep412. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12941
Cohen, J., Hutt, E., Berlin, R., & Wiseman, E. (2022). The Change We Cannot See: Instructional Quality and Classroom Observation in the Era of Common Core. Educational Policy, 36(6), 1261–1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820951114
D’Almeida Souza, Y. J., Fernandes, A. G., & Nunes Ferraz, N. (2025). Monocular reading performance measured by MNREAD-P acuity chart in normo-readers schoolchildren. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91627-3
Darwin, S., & Barahona, M. (2023). Making research (more) real for future teachers: A classroom-based research model for initial teacher education. Educational Action Research, 31(4), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1980073
Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G., & Malaurent, J. (2021). Research Perspectives: Improving Action Research by Integrating Methods. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(3), 851–873. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00682
Dharmawan, G., & Suryadarma, D. (2021). Education Quality across Indonesia’s Districts: Estimations from a Policy Experiment. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 38(3), 401–425.
Gliksman, Y., Berebbi, S., & Henik, A. (2022). Math Fluency during Primary School. Brain Sciences, 12(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030371
Goldhammer, F., Kroehne, U., Hahnel, C., & De Boeck, P. (2021). Controlling speed in component skills of reading improves the explanation of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000655
Hossain, K. I. (2024). Literature-based language learning: Challenges, and opportunities for English learners. Ampersand, 13, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100201
Kim, J. (2024). Leading teachers’ perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8693–8724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12109-5
Kirana, A. W., Segoh, D., Syukri, M. A., & Prassetyo, S. (2025). Sentence Processing in Indonesian-English Bilingual Children with and without Language Impairment. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 25(4), 796–816. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2025-2504-01
Klimovich, M., Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Richter, T. (2023). Does speed-reading training work, and if so, why? Effects of speed-reading training and metacognitive training on reading speed, comprehension and eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 46(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12417
Korinth, S. P., & Nagler, T. (2021). Improving reading rates and comprehension? Benefits and limitations of the reading acceleration approach. Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(3), e12408. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12408
Kukkonen, K. (2021). Reading, Fast and Slow. Poetics Today, 42(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-8883192
Mézière, D. C., Yu, L., Reichle, E. D., von der Malsburg, T., & McArthur, G. (2023). Using Eye-Tracking Measures to Predict Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(3), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.498
Nurkamto, J., Drajati, N. A., Ngadiso, N., & Karlina, Y. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in teaching reading at Islamic secondary schools in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31753
Picton, A., Greenfield, S., & Parry, J. (2022). Why do students struggle in their first year of medical school? A qualitative study of student voices. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03158-4
Rabgay, T., & Kidman, G. (2023). Multiple iterations and messiness in the implementation of action research by Bhutanese secondary science teachers. Discover Education, 2(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00077-4
Ranucci, D., Falco, F., Nicolella, V., Marra, L. A., Caracciolo, F., Migliaccio, L., Corsini, G., Esposito, A., Castiello, A., Petracca, M., Moccia, M., Brescia Morra, V., Lanzillo, R., & Carotenuto, A. (2026). Dysarthria assessment in multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 32(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251400108
Rets, I., Herodotou, C., Bayer, V., Hlosta, M., & Rienties, B. (2021). Exploring critical factors of the perceived usefulness of a learning analytics dashboard for distance university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00284-9
Schurz, A., Coumel, M., & Hüttner, J. (2022). Accuracy and Fluency Teaching and the Role of Extramural English: A Tale of Three Countries. Languages, 7(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7010035
Shaaban, T. S., & Mohamed, A. M. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of augmented reality technology on reading comprehension skills among early childhood pupils with learning disabilities. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00269-9
Sinaga, B., Sitorus, J., & Situmeang, T. (2023). The influence of students’ problem-solving understanding and results of students’ mathematics learning. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1088556
Stamatakis, E., Huang, B.-H., Maher, C., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Stathi, A., Dempsey, P. C., Johnson, N., Holtermann, A., Chau, J. Y., Sherrington, C., Daley, A. J., Hamer, M., Murphy, M. H., Tudor-Locke, C., & Gibala, M. J. (2021). Untapping the Health Enhancing Potential of Vigorous Intermittent Lifestyle Physical Activity (VILPA): Rationale, Scoping Review, and a 4-Pillar Research Framework. Sports Medicine, 51(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01368-8
Thuan, P. D. (2025). Exploring EFL students’ pronunciation through the application of AI-powered tool Reading Progress: A case study in Vietnam. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 44(3), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v44i3.80752
Tsang, A., & Dewaele, J. M. (2024). The relationships between young FL learners’ classroom emotions (anxiety, boredom, & enjoyment), engagement, and FL proficiency. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(5), 2015–2034. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0077
van der Velde, M., Harmsen, W., Veldkamp, B. P., Feskens, R., Keuning, J., & Swart, N. (2025). Speech Enabled Reading Fluency Assessment: A Validation Study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(4), 2569–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00480-y
Widiati, U., Sharif, T. I. S. bt T., Karmina, S., & Zubaidi, N. (2023). Literacy Teaching Strategies: Do Indonesian Secondary EFL Teachers Practice What They Know? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 339–364.
Wijaya, A. W. A., Siantoro, A., Triwibowo, H., Asih, R. A., Sambo, M., & Layuk, M. (2025). Literacy improvement for remote primary school students in Papua, Indonesia: The “Wahana Literasi” program. Issues in Educational Research, 35(1), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.T2025050800004391986756294
Yulian, R. (2021). The flipped classroom: Improving critical thinking for critical reading of EFL learners in higher education. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.18366
Zheng, L., Jiang, F., Gu, X., Li, Y., Wang, G., & Zhang, H. (2025). Teaching via LLM-enhanced simulations: Authenticity and barriers to suspension of disbelief. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100990
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hana Nurul Afifi, Misrodin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
