Ideological Contestation and Identity Politics in the Sustainability of Indonesian Elections

Authors

  • Refaldy bernalis fasya Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Rican Aldiano Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Queena Tia Rumaysa Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Exciyana Zevany Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Rudi Santoso Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64268/jilhs.v1i3.123

Keywords:

Democratic Sustainability, Electoral Politics, Identity Politics, Indonesian Elections, Political Ideology

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s electoral democracy continues to evolve alongside the growing influence of ideological rivalry and identity-based political narratives. In recent elections, political actors have increasingly used religious, ethnic, and social identities to attract public support, creating challenges for democratic consistency and national cohesion.

Aims: This study examines the relationship between political ideology and identity politics and their influence on the continuity and quality of electoral democracy in Indonesia.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive method was applied through literature analysis and the examination of political developments related to Indonesian elections. The study used secondary data from scholarly articles, books, and official reports.

Result: The study shows that identity politics has become a dominant strategy in electoral competition because it effectively shapes voter preferences and public opinion. However, excessive reliance on identity issues may intensify political polarization and reduce the focus on substantive policy debates. Meanwhile, ideological competition still plays an important role in maintaining democratic direction and political accountability.

Conclusion: The interaction between ideology and identity politics strongly influences the sustainability of elections in Indonesia. Strengthening civic education, democratic values, and inclusive political participation is necessary to support a more stable and substantive democratic process.

References

Akmaliah, W., & Nadzir, I. (2024). The ‘Elective Affinity’ of Islamic Populism, Mobilization and Social Media: A Case Study of Indonesian Politic Identity Within the Three Elections. Studia Islamika, 31(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v31i1.36305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v31i1.36305

Bentzen, J. S., & Gokmen, G. (2023). The power of religion. Journal of Economic Growth, 28(1), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-022-09214-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-022-09214-4

Bittner, V. K. (2023). Dialectic icons: Controversial public figures as emotional catalysts in contentious political discourse. https://doi.org/10.1332/263169021X16824558710337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/263169021X16824558710337

Bliuc, A.-M., Yilmaz, I., Norrie, R., De Groot Heupner, S., Morieson, N., & Belanger, M. J. (2026). The emotional logic of populist communication: A systematic review. Information, Communication & Society, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2026.2639567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2026.2639567

Crosson, J. M., & Tsebelis, G. (2022). Multiple vote electoral systems: A remedy for political polarization. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(6), 932–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1901962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1901962

Dold, M., & Krieger, T. (2023). The ideological use and abuse of Freiburg’s ordoliberalism. Public Choice, 195(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00875-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00875-0

Ecker-Ehrhardt, M., Dellmuth, L., & Tallberg, J. (2024). Ideology and Legitimacy in Global Governance. International Organization, 78(4), 731–765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818324000304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818324000304

Gozgor, G. (2022). The role of economic uncertainty in the rise of EU populism. Public Choice, 190(1), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00933-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00933-7

Guriev, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2022). The Political Economy of Populism. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(3), 753–832. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201595

Hasrul, M., Patittingi, F., & Yunus, A. (2025). Simplifying the Multiparty System or Compromising Equality? Legal Challenges and the Current Political Landscape in Indonesia. Sriwijaya Law Review, 416–431. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.v9i2.4030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.v9i2.4030

Hidayah, A. R., Bajari, A., Hidayat, D. R., & Maryani, E. (2025). Shifting from Religious Populism to Authoritarian Populism: Two Decades of Identity Politics Dynamics in Indonesia. Social Sciences, 14(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14010045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14010045

Jin, Y., & Yang, K. (n.d.). Resilient Democracy or Fragile Democracy? The Declaration of Martial Law and Presidential Impeachment in South Korea. Retrieved May 16, 2026, from https://online.ucpress.edu/as/article/65/6/729/213266/Resilient-Democracy-or-Fragile-Democracy-The DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2025.2680816

Kiess, J. (2026). Building democratic resilience: The impact of political engagement during education on xenophobia and political trust. Acta Politica, 61(1), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-024-00370-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-024-00370-6

Mietzner, M. (2022). Sources of resistance to democratic decline: Indonesian civil society and its trials. In Democratic Regressions in Asia. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003346395-9

Nai, A. (2021). Fear and Loathing in Populist Campaigns? Comparing the Communication Style of Populists and Non-populists in Elections Worldwide. Journal of Political Marketing, 20(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1491439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1491439

Octavianne, H., Suhariadi, F., Mudzakkir, M. F., Trianto, D., & Chamdan, U. (2024a). Identity Politics and Polarization in Contemporary Muslim Countries: The Impact of Elections, Social Media, and Global Dynamics. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 3(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v3i2.9909

Octavianne, H., Suhariadi, F., Mudzakkir, M. F., Trianto, D., & Chamdan, U. (2024b). Identity Politics and Polarization in Contemporary Muslim Countries: The Impact of Elections, Social Media, and Global Dynamics. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 3(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v3i2.9909

Octavianne, H., Suhariadi, F., Mudzakkir, M. F., Trianto, D., & Chamdan, U. (2024c). Identity Politics and Polarization in Contemporary Muslim Countries: The Impact of Elections, Social Media, and Global Dynamics. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 3(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v3i2.9909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/vfb0zc94

Orofino, E. (2021). Framing, new social identity and long-term loyalty. Hizb ut-Tahrir’s impact on its members. Social Movement Studies, 20(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1722629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1722629

Özel, I. D., & Aydin, U. (2026). Erosion of Competition Policy in the Age of Populism: Cases of Hungary, Mexico and Turkey. Governance, 39(2), e70116. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70116

Reiljan, A., & Ryan, A. (2021). Ideological Tripolarization, Partisan Tribalism and Institutional Trust: The Foundations of Affective Polarization in the Swedish Multiparty System. Scandinavian Political Studies, 44(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12194

Sajida, S. (2026). The expansion of military influence in Indonesia’s governance: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of media narratives. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102428

Schedler, A. (2023). Rethinking Political Polarization. Political Science Quarterly, 138(3), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqad038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqad038

Suhardi, A. J. (2025). The Impact of Identity Politics in Elections on Social Polarization in Urban Indonesian Communities. Journal of the American Institute, 2(8), 1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.71364/zwezgj35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.71364/zwezgj35

Tudor, M., & Slater, D. (2021). Nationalism, Authoritarianism, and Democracy: Historical Lessons from South and Southeast Asia. Perspectives on Politics, 19(3), 706–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759272000078X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759272000078X

Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., & van Zomeren, M. (2021). Identity Expression Through Collective Action: How Identification With a Politicized Group and Its Identity Contents Differently Motivated Identity-Expressive Collective Action in the U.S. 2016 Presidential Elections. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(3), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220933406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220933406

Uddin, Md. K. (2026). Strategic Communication in Post-Truth Societies: Introducing the Identity–Trust–Emotion (ITE) Framework. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2026.2657602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2026.2657602

von Malmborg, F. (2024). Strategies and Impacts of Policy Entrepreneurs: Ideology, Democracy, and the Quest for a Just Transition to Climate Neutrality. Sustainability, 16(12), 5272. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125272

Vries, C. E. D., Hobolt, S. B., & Walter, S. (2021). Politicizing International Cooperation: The Mass Public, Political Entrepreneurs, and Political Opportunity Structures. International Organization, 75(2), 306–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000491

Widian, R., Satya, P. A. N. I. P., & Yazid, S. (2023). Religion in Indonesia’s Elections: An Implementation of a Populist Strategy? Politics and Religion, 16(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048321000195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048321000195

Wolton, L., & Crow, D. A. (2022). Politicking with evidence: Examining evidence-based issues in electoral policy narratives. Policy Sciences, 55(4), 661–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09478-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09478-y

Yuniar, A. D., Ananda, K. S., & Kamarudin, S. B. (2026). Fragmented information, divided publics: Exploring the polarization between deliberative and activist orientations during Indonesian elections. Media Asia, 53(1), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2025.2582030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2025.2582030

Zingher, J. N. (2023). How Social Group Memberships Interact to Shape Partisanship, Policy Orientations, and Vote Choice. Political Behavior, 45(2), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09725-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09725-7

Downloads

Published

2026-05-18

How to Cite

fasya, R. bernalis, Aldiano, R., Rumaysa, Q. T., Zevany , E., & Santoso, R. (2026). Ideological Contestation and Identity Politics in the Sustainability of Indonesian Elections. Journal of Islamic Law and Humanitarian Studies, 2(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.64268/jilhs.v1i3.123