Moral Endogeneity Of Love, Trust, And Consciousness In Islamic Economics Of Cooperation Contrary To Their Moral Exogeneity In Neoliberal Theory Of Economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64268/jifes.v1i2.37Keywords:
Economic cooperation versus competition , Epistemology Ontology, Qur’anic methodological worldview, Tawhidi (monotheistic) law of unity of knowledge, Western socio-scientific methodologyAbstract
Background: The conceptual triad of Love, Trust, and Consciousness occupies a central role in shaping socio-economic systems. In the Qur’anic methodological worldview, these elements are intrinsically integrated with material reality through the Tawhidi (monotheistic) law of unity of knowledge, forming an endogenous foundation for cooperation. By contrast, neoliberal economics externalizes ethical considerations, positioning them as exogenous to material processes, which fosters competition, systemic conflict, and distributive injustice.
Aims: This study seeks to articulate the ontological and epistemological framework of cooperation within Islamic economics, rooted in the Tawhidi paradigm, and to critically contrast it with the competitive, self-interest-driven paradigm of mainstream economic theory.
Methods: Adopting a mesoscience approach, the research develops a model of circular causation and pervasive complementarities, wherein moral and material variables are simulated within a composite wellbeing function. The analysis juxtaposes Qur’anic cooperative principles with the optimization and equilibrium constructs central to neoclassical economics.
Results: The findings reveal that the Tawhidi framework consistently generates positive inter-variable complementarities, thereby enhancing the wellbeing criterion and sustaining resource regeneration. Unlike neoliberal competition, which erodes trust and equity, the cooperative paradigm aligns with the maqasid al-shari’ah by promoting justice, equality, and global brotherhood.
Conclusion: The study concludes that the Qur’anic law of unity of knowledge provides a superior epistemic and methodological foundation for achieving holistic and sustainable wellbeing. By embedding Love, Trust, and Consciousness within economic relations, it dismantles the scarcity-based logic of marginal productivity, optimality, and steady-state equilibrium. In its place emerges an evolutionary model of resource abundance, institutional complementarity, and moral-material integration. This paradigm not only fulfills the ethical imperatives of Islamic economics but also offers a viable, empirically grounded alternative for addressing contemporary global challenges in justice, equity, and planetary stewardship.
References
Antonelli, G. A., Di Prisco, D., & Leone, M. I. (2025). Trust in Open Innovation: An Integrated Model Based on a Systematic Literature Review. R&D Management, radm.70007. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.70007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.70007
Basaure, A., Finley, B., & Hämmäinen, H. (2021). Spectrum assignment for connected vehicles: Local licensing versus coopetition. 179, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.08.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.08.009
Chappert, H., Chiambaretto, P., Fernandez, A.-S., & Djamen, R. (2024). “Us Versus Them”: The impact of homophily and trust in partner selection and cooperation intensity in coopetitive agreements. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, NS-14. https://journals.openedition.org/fcs/12200. https://doi.org/10.4000/11r8c DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/11r8c
Choudhury, M. A. (2020). Islamic Economics as Mesoscience: A New Paradigm of Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6054-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6054-5
Choudhury, M. A. (2024a). Handbook of Islamic Philosophy of Science: Economics, Society and Science. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5634-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5634-0
Choudhury, M. A. (2024b). Intra-systemic and Inter-systemic Tawhidi IIE(θ(ε))-Model of Ethics and the World-System. In M. A. Choudhury, Handbook of Islamic Philosophy of Science (pp. 691–728). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5634-0_22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5634-0_22
Choudhury, M. A., Hoque, M. N., Zakaria, N. B., & Erum, N. (2025). Moral Singularity, Consciousness, and Artificial Intelligence in The Algorithmic Age of Islamic Economics, Finance, Society, and Science. Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21154/invest.v5i1.10223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/invest.v5i1.10223
Chu, C.-P., & Park, S.-C. (Eds.). (2023). Strategies in Changing Global Orders: Competition and Conflict versus Cooperation. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7246-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7246-3
DeCaro, D. A., Boamah, E. F., Rudolph, M. A., & Adusei, G. A. (2025). Maladaptive state reinforcement of greenspace in racially marginalized neighborhoods: Lessons from Louisville, Kentucky’s failed cooperative extension partnership. 30(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-16038-300203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-16038-300203
Elhendi, R., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2024). “The rubber band is already broken”: An extended case study of UNDP transformative resilience framework in the context of Palestine. Communication Monographs, 91(4), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2024.2316129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2024.2316129
Elsamadony, M., Pileggi, S. F., Liu, J., & Fujii, M. (2025). Crafting a resilient and sustainable future amid major crises. 145583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145583
Elston, T., & Bel, G. (2023). Does inter-municipal collaboration improve public service resilience? Evidence from local authorities in England. Public Management Review, 25(4), 734–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2012377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2012377
Enke, B. (2024). Moral Boundaries. Annual Review of Economics, 16(1), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-091223-093730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-091223-093730
Ferreira, M. I. A. (2024). The Quest for an AI Ethics: Between Benevolence and Greed. In M. I. Aldinhas Ferreira (Ed.), Producing Artificial Intelligent Systems (Vol. 1150, pp. 155–167). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55817-7_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55817-7_10
George, G., Fewer, T. J., Lazzarini, S., McGahan, A. M., & Puranam, P. (2024). Partnering for Grand Challenges: A Review of Organizational Design Considerations in Public–Private Collaborations. Journal of Management, 50(1), 10–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221148992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221148992
Group, W. B. (2024). Global Economic Prospects, June 2024. World Bank Publications. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=PfFiEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT10&dq=Furthermore,+military+expenditure+has+grown+disproportionately%E2%80%94rising+37%25+cumulatively+between+2015+and+2024%E2%80%94indicating+that+resource+allocation+priorities+remain+skewed+toward+competitive+rather+than+cooperative+ends+&ots=DrE_J9eIAu&sig=YyoIJCczbcmIu5Rgflt4p3t7LZA
Hendlin, Y. H., & Palazzo, F. P. (2025). Compartmentalization by industry and government inhibits addressing climate denial. 4(1), e0000552. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000552
Huang, W., Li, J., & Edwards, P. P. (2018). Mesoscience: Exploring the common principle at mesoscales. 5(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx083
Husni, H., & Hayden, W. (2024). The Epistemology of Ta’dib in Islamic Civilizational Discourse: Reviving and Reconstructing Contemporary Muslim Scholars’ Views. 19(1), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol19no1.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol19no1.14
Ibrahim, A.-J. (2022). The Role of Islamic Finance in the Growth of the Circular Economy. Hamad Bin Khalifa University (Qatar). https://search.proquest.com/openview/eb4933cc685d38a6a67ae7cc84aaa3ee/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y
Kauschke, L. (2023). The User Perspective. In L. Kauschke (Ed.), The Transition to Smart Mobility: Acceptance and Roles in Future Transportation (pp. 19–212). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43001-6_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43001-6_2
Kimball, K. E. H. (2025). The Inextricable Link Between Gendered Security and State Stability: Strategic Costs of US Humanitarian Retrenchment. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5229&context=cmc_theses
Luzzini, D., Pagell, M., Devenin, V., Miemczyk, J., Longoni, A., & Banerjee, B. (2024). Rethinking Supply Chain Management in a Post‐Growth Era. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 60(4), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12332
Mendelson, M., Lewnard, J. A., Sharland, M., Cook, A., Pouwels, K. B., Alimi, Y., Mpundu, M., Wesangula, E., Weese, J. S., & Røttingen, J.-A. (2024). Ensuring progress on sustainable access to effective antibiotics at the 2024 UN General Assembly: A target-based approach. 403(10443), 2551–2564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01019-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01019-5
Namany, S., Haji, M., Alherbawi, M., & Al-Ansari, T. (2024). Strategic Decision-Making in Duopolistic Energy and Water Markets: Examining Competition versus Cooperation for Farm Siting Optimization. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering (Vol. 53, pp. 607–612). Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780443288241501022. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50102-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50102-2
Ortiz, E. A., Vergara, N. C., Pabón, T. F., Gambi, G. D. N., Giambruno, C., Alfaro, M. P., & Segura, D. R. (2025). AI and Education: Building the Future Through Digital Transformation. https://publications.iadb.org/en/ai-and-education-building-future-through-digital-transformation
Ramstead, M. J. D., Seth, A. K., Hesp, C., Sandved-Smith, L., Mago, J., Lifshitz, M., Pagnoni, G., Smith, R., Dumas, G., Lutz, A., Friston, K., & Constant, A. (2022). From Generative Models to Generative Passages: A Computational Approach to (Neuro) Phenomenology. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 13(4), 829–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00604-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00604-y
Robertson, N. (2025, January 15). The Futures of Value:Strategic Pathways for Integrating Profit and Purpose [MRP]. OCAD University. https://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/4616/
Rochmatullah, M. R. (2025). Do You Think This is Philanthropy? Think Again. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 22(4), 467–512. https://doi.org/10.51327/TPHW3488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51327/TPHW3488
Roemer, J. E. (2022). Cooperation and market socialism: Kant versus Nash. 72(S1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2022.00016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2022.00016
Siverbo, S., Johansson-Berg, T., Øllgaard Bentzen, T., & Winsvold, M. (2024). On the diffusion and implementation of trust-based management in Scandinavia: Cross-country survey evidence. 37(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2023-0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2023-0020
Skonhoft, A., & Kourantidou, M. (2021). Managing a Natural Asset That Is Both a Value and a Nuisance: Competition versus Cooperation for the Barents Sea Red King Crab. Marine Resource Economics, 36(3), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/714416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/714416
Tan, L. K., Li, N. P., & Tan, K. (2024). Cash, crowds, and cooperation: The effects of population density and resource scarcity on cooperation in the dictator game. 45(4), 106581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.009
Yuan, L., Li, R., He, W., Wu, X., Kong, Y., Degefu, D. M., & Ramsey, T. S. (2022). Coordination of the industrial-ecological economy in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 882221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.882221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.882221