Beyond Formal Instruction: Family-Based Qur’anic Literacy as a Site of Informal Religious Governance in Rural Muslim Communities

Authors

  • Ayu Purnama Sari INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI BENGKULU, INDONESIA
  • Alfauzan Amin Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Fatrica Syafri Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64268/ijors.v1i2.87

Keywords:

Family-based religious practice, Informal religious governance, Qur’anic literacy, Rural Muslim community, Religious socialization

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines family-based Qur’anic literacy practices as a form of informal religious governance within a rural Muslim community. Rather than focusing on formal religious instruction, the article explores how parental involvement, delegation to informal religious actors, and everyday household norms shape children’s engagement with Qur’anic reading.

Method: The research employed a qualitative field-based approach conducted in a rural Muslim village in Indonesia. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with parents and children, participant observation of daily religious practices, and documentation of community religious activities. The data were analyzed thematically to identify patterns of parental responsibility, modes of religious transmission, and mechanisms of informal regulation within the family setting.

Findings: The findings reveal that Qur’anic literacy within families is governed less by structured instruction and more by informal arrangements rooted in moral obligation and social expectations. While parents acknowledge religious responsibility, practical involvement is often limited due to occupational demands and reliance on external religious figures such as Qur’anic teachers. This delegation produces a fragmented model of religious governance in which authority, responsibility, and practice are dispersed rather than centrally coordinated within the household.

Significance: This study contributes to international religious studies by reframing family-based Qur’anic education as a site of informal religious governance rather than merely a pedagogical process. By highlighting how everyday religious practices are regulated through informal norms and delegated authority, the article offers a novel analytical lens for understanding lived religion in rural Muslim contexts. The findings extend discussions on religious governance beyond formal institutions and provide comparative insights for scholars examining faith transmission in non-institutional settings

References

Almarayeh, T., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2025). Do religious values mitigate the effect of formal corporate governance rules on earnings management in Islamic countries? Evidence from Jordan. Competitiveness Review, 35(6), 1039–1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-03-2024-0055

Aparicio, S., Martinez-Moya, D., Muñoz-Mora, J. C., & Urbano, D. (2025). Managing destructive entrepreneurship in place: Formal and informal institutions for the achievement of regional economic growth. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-025-01090-7

Babacan, M. (2025). The impact of religious socialization on the crisis of faith: The case of young Turks in Türkiye. 16(10), 1297.

Bellido-García, R., Cruzata-Martinez, A., Marín, M. P., & Borjas, L. G. R. (2022). Implicit theories on learning assessment and the use of triangulation as a means of qualitative validity and reliability. 27(5), 1276–1300.

Berger, R., Ali, A. J., Barnes, B. R., & Alon, I. (2025). Doing business in an Islamic context: Six schools of thought. 16(1), 104–122.

Hasmin, H., & Nurung, J. (2025). Religious-Based Family Management and Sustainable Household Consumption: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 46, 92–107. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.10137

Hodgson, G. M. (2025). Formal and informal institutions: Some problems of meaning, impact, and interaction. 21, e1.

HosseiniNasab, S. M. (2025). A maturity-driven selection model for effective digital transformation governance mechanisms in large organizations. 54(9), 5106–5132.

Kahl, P. (2025). The Epistemic Architecture of Power: How Knowledge Control Sustains Authority in Social Structures. https://philarchive.org/rec/KAHTEA-3

Khurshid, F., Veen, M., Thompson, J., & Hegazi, I. (2026). Navigating Thematic Analysis: Practical Strategies Grounded in Abductive Reasoning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 38(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2025.2475098

Marshall, H. (2024). Reimagining religious education: Integrating ethnographic and anthropological perspectives. British Journal of Religious Education, 46(4), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2024.2373778

Munung, N. S., Nembaware, V., Osei-Tutu, L., Treadwell, M., Chide, O. E., Bukini, D., Tutuba, H., SickleInAfrica ELSI WG, Nkanyemka, M., Anie, K., Royale, C., & Wonkam, A. (2022). Assent, parental consent and reconsent for health research in Africa: Thematic analysis of national guidelines and lessons from the SickleInAfrica registry. BMC Medical Ethics, 23(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00843-3

Murtazashvili, I., & Murtazashvili, J. B. (2024). Informal institutions in comparative politics. 56(4), 541–560.

Nkosi, B., Zanoni, B., Seeley, J., & Strode, A. (2022). The ethical‐legal requirements for adolescent self‐consent to research in sub‐Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Bioethics, 36(5), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12988

Pereira Arena, V. (2025). Rights, Pragmatism, and Governance: Religion in Uruguay’s Prisons. International Journal of Latin American Religions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41603-025-00317-5

Perez-Vela, R. (2023). The mediatization of religious practices in urban daily life: The Peruvian case. 14(5), 649.

Riskawati, T., Salim, W., Hidayat Putro, H. P., & Ginting, H. (2025). Faith-driven leaders in a non-theocratic country: Internalizing Muhammadiyah values in local governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2025.2571898

Samuel, A., & Merkebu, J. (2025). Exploring Sampling Strategies to Maximize Qualitative Research Studies in Adult Education. Adult Learning, 10451595251349183. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595251349183

Schlunegger, M. C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Palm, R. (2024). Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 46(8), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241263011

Shende, M. (2025). Covert Thought Reform: Adapting Classical Models Across Political, Cultural, and Organizational Contexts. Cultural, and Organizational Contexts (September 06, 2025). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5452614

Smith, J. D., Adam, R., & Maarif, S. (2024). How social movements use religious creativity to address environmental crises in Indonesian local communities. 84, 102772.

Ulfat, F. (2025). Islamic Religious Education and Practical Theology: Disciplinary Profiles and Key Research Areas in the German-Speaking Context. International Journal of Practical Theology, 29(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijpt-2025-0049

van der Steen, M. P., & Trapp, R. (2025). The exercise of informal influence through intra-organizational impression management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 38(9), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2023-6573

Wang, J., & Lin, Q. (2025). Religious tourism, volunteering, and online footprints: An actor–network theory analysis. Current Issues in Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2025.2511999

Wilson, J. (2025). Interpretive Description and Reflexive Thematic Analysis: Exploring Conceptual Coherence and Methodological Integrity. Qualitative Health Research, 10497323251378303. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251378303

Yang, L., Wang, Y., & Geng, H. (2025). The power of informal institutions: Evidence from the impact of religious culture on corporate green governance in China. Empirical Economics, 69(1), 213–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-025-02741-0

Yoon, B., & Uliassi, C. (2022). ‘ Researcher-As-Instrument’ in Qualitative Research: The Complexities of the Educational Researcher’s Identities. 27(4). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=10520147&AN=156388221&h=bdgdgnv297SBiHyeFfCt6OU0a9nxitDClB39gIc0DNrjXZXvOV1%2Ff0ilrdIq6pzWVlNmdMeIoCKcdiiXYAUy8w%3D%3D&crl=c

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17